This is the story of a little house in Queens that broke my heart.

000

A few years ago, I was working on a movie that sent me to Richmond Hill, Queens, to find a beautiful, one-of-a-kind house.  If you’ve never visited, Richmond Hill has a number of gorgeous turn-of-the-century Victorians…

000a

…and in fact, chances are you’ve seen at least one or two Richmond Hill houses before in a film or TV show. Productions are always in the neighborhood for this rare look that’s tough to find:

000b

For this particular film, we were looking for something a bit smaller, and it didn’t take long before I stumbled on this gem, built in 1905.

002

The exterior was gorgeous, and looked to be in pristine condition…

108

…and I especially loved the two upper floors, with their wonderful ornamentation and two oval windows. It turned out the house was for sale, and I quickly made an appointment for a tour.

003

As we were walking around the interior, I was equally impressed by the quality and personal touch in each room. It was clear that whoever used to live here cherished this house.

002b

Out of curiosity, I asked what the house’s background was, and was told that its former owner, Nancy Cataldi, a local preservationist, had recently passed away. And suddenly, it all made sense.

Nancy was a major advocate for historical preservation in Richmond Hill, and had worked tirelessly to preserve the neighborhood she called home. She served as the president of the Richmond Hill Historical Society for nearly a decade, and is a major reason why so much beauty can still be found in Richmond Hill today. In fact, the street we were on was given the co-name “Nancy Cataldi Way” following her death.

201 To Backyard

As we were walking around looking at what remained of her possessions, I suddenly got a very sad feeling in the pit of my stomach. Nancy was gone, but her soul was all around us – in the worn floorboards, the antique furniture, the intricate wallpaper…But it was like I could feel that soul fading.

202 Backyard

Ultimately, we didn’t film in the house due to rewrites moving the characters into a Manhattan apartment. Still, I never forgot the place, and when I was asked to find a house a few weeks ago, I immediately headed out to Richmond Hill to see if it might still be an option.

But as I drove by, something was wrong…

IMG_9076

Maybe I didn’t have the correct address? I pulled over and double-checked my notes.

IMG_9084

And then I realized:

002

I was at the right address.

IMG_9063

Despite all her efforts and the endless amounts of preservation work she did in Richmond Hill, Nancy was never able to get her own street protected; the Landmarks Preservation Commission rejected her proposal in 2001.

201 To Backyard

IMG_9080

According to this 2010 Daily News article, the new homeowners claim they were forced to renovate due to an invasion of carpenter ants.

106a

106b

You know what? Words are kind of failing me, so I’ll just let my pictures speak for themselves.

103a

103b

103c

104

105

106

We ALL benefit from people like Nancy Cataldi long after they pass, and while it’s cute to name streets after preservationists, it’s a lot more important to carry on their legacy. Hopefully, this is a reminder of that.

Rest in peace, Nancy.

-SCOUT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. april connolly Avatar

    This was an absolutely beautiful house. I was getting excited reading this thinking if this house is still for sale I would considor this house seriously. Then I saw what happened to it. It’s too bad the new owners have such really bad taste. It’s downright ugly now. What a shame. This should be a crime against this house.

  2. Robbie Avatar

    Oh my goodness gracious. So so so sad. The neighbors must hate the new owners! It would be ghastly to live opposite. I absolutely loved the house as it was with the pretty blue woodwork..so charming.
    There is no accounting for taste (or lack thereof).

  3. Connie@Connie Nikiforoff Designs Avatar

    Although I’m sure this “renovation” meets with the new family’s lifestyle, having this home lose its original charm and grace would be more in the lines of a “bastardization” to me than a “renovation”.

    I’m going to paraphrase something I heard someone else say “If you want to start “renovating” a house to be something it didn’t start out to be architecturally, then maybe you need to look for a different house.”

    Bottom line: There are some things, like the house in this article, that are meant to “stay the same”. Preservation NOT renovation!

  4. RW Avatar
    RW

    The kindest thing would be to demolish the house and to take away home ownership privileges (a life sentence.)

    Why people buy old houses only to scrub every atom of old out of the place, injecting them with plastic fillers and botox and acres of concrete and vinyl fence and the cheapest possible extruded gutters. Their budget exhausted by these improvements, they are probably saving up to replace every blade of grass with blinding white gravel and cherry red mulch around the plastic poodle topiaries sure to come.

  5. Mary Avatar
    Mary

    No words……;(

  6. shu Avatar
    shu

    its just 2 different styles. don’t understand how sad this could be

  7. Dawn Avatar

    I find that restoration projects should be like plastic surgery. You don’t change the entire face/body, you should be freshening up and fixing poorly designed areas (like a nose). This house obviously had a soul and a certain design style.
    If the new homeowners needed to update and remodel due to some needed work, then they owed it to themselves, the neighborhood and that house to get a quality architect in there to help guide them on how to update but still maintain the quality of the house.
    This remodel is not only a disservice to the home and neighborhood, it’s simply poorly designed.

  8. Autumn Avatar
    Autumn

    I am all for historic preservation. However I have a different slant on what seems to be everyone’s opinions. I do not blame the new owners at all.They bought a house in a historic neighborhood; but what were the stipulations of Ms Cataldi’s will? She could have saved her house by putting it in her will. Also why didn’t the remaining members of the historical society push on the city to make this home offically “Historical”? It does not take that long if you know the right people. Were there ever any City Councel Meetings about the preservation of this property? These meetings are open to the PUBLIC. How many of you that live there did one thing to move that this home be made a historical home?

    Why weren’t there any stipulations in the Real Estate Contract?

    The current residents bought the house leagally without any conditions in the real estate sale. Therefor they have every right to remodel as they see fit.

    I live in a historial small city that is filled with street upon street of beautiful Victorians and original Arts & Crafts Homes all in pristine condition. In some of the neigborhoods there are a few “new builds” that match the estetics of the neighborhood. Last but not least I live in a very nice neighborhood in a ranch style mid century modern which suites me as I prefer a one story home and the mid century style. I also love all of the Queen Annes I see everyday; but I am glad I do not have to pay for the maintenence of these beloved “Ladies”

    My point is I feel most of you are pointing your fingers and wagging your tongues at the wrong people. All the new owners did was buy a home and remodel it. They did not break the law.
    Something to consider as you drag these people through the coals.

  9. Rebecca Gonzalez Avatar

    Boo hoo. Enough said.

  10. Doug Avatar
    Doug

    I don’t care about the regulations or historic preservation rules or your explanation about protecting the new owners and what their rights are……the bottom line is we had a really cool, wonderful home ruined by new owners. It looks like crap…..bad brick, gaudy extensions….cement over grass……just bad taste. Boo hoo is definitely not enough said. Yikes…..look what they did!!!!????

  11. tapd0g Avatar
    tapd0g

    What a shame. If there were invasive ants I could understand doing repairs but surely they could be done in a way that is sensitive to the history of the house. Still once a house passes into another’s ownwership, it is theirs to do as they please. One reasone why heritage listing of historically important buildings (even domestic ones) is a good idea!

  12. Beth Avatar
    Beth

    An abomination to the home and to history. Do you suppose they thought the gaudy eagles would scare away any future carpenter ants? For the record, they used the ants as a poor excuse . I’m from New Orleans and thank god we have strick preservation laws in our historic districts. We suffer from swarms of termites every year but we know how to prevent them from eating our homes. And we know how to repair any damage they cause without stripping away history and architecture to do it. I don’t see how any of that was necessary to deal with the carpenter ants in New York. I truly hope Nancy doesn’t know. It would break her heart. It does mine.

  13. Jade Avatar
    Jade

    Ha! That front porch DOES look like an evil face now! Eek! :/

  14. Victoria Avatar

    That has to be the saddest house in the world and not just New York.

  15. Becky Avatar
    Becky

    That is foul!

    It’s harder than it’s ever been to get historic districts declared, at least in my part of the country. Sad and sort of surprised to see in happening in New York also.

  16. House Crazy Sarah Avatar

    Well I’m going to dive right into this one:

    The house was beautiful. It had soul, it was loved. It was a historic treasure and has been around a lot longer than you or I. Yes, I agree that individuals should be able to express themselves any darn way they please and I don’t believe in conforming to societal standards. (I’m a go-against-the grain type of gal, afterall.)

    HOWEVER, I do strongly believe in my heart of hearts that this house was wronged, and hey, houses have feelings too!

    In my humble opinion, this home was denied its inalienable right to peacefully exist. A long-standing historic item like this – which has seen two Worlds Wars, The Great Depression and countless other episodes of history should have some rights of its own that supercede the individual rights of a Homo sapien whose subjective tastes and whims vary like puffs of fleeting smoke.

    You can read my whole opinion at: http://www.house-crazy.com/the-great-debate-a-houses-rights-vs-individual-owners-rights/

    Great post Scout!!!

  17. Gail Alexander Avatar
    Gail Alexander

    Just because a house is old, does not make it historic. I think the main structure of this house is intact, icluding many moldings. A porch and the finish on this house is the only change. It looks taken care of now. I like the changes.

  18. HouseTalkN Avatar

    As I scrolled down, I kept saying “oh, no. oh, no. oh, no!”
    It makes me so sad to see the “subdivision-ization” of older homes.
    Thanks for the reminder of the importance to protect these gems.
    Kerry at HouseTalkN

  19. Albert Avatar
    Albert

    If you want a new house than buy a new house. Dont buy a historicly beautiful home and turn it into a new house. I hate seeing this all the time. The only good thing I can say is at least they didnt tear it down and build a McMansion. Im afraid to think of what they did to the inside.

  20. Tania Avatar
    Tania

    Hideousness with a capital “H”.